Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- aboutmasterproject [2019/07/23 11:47]
etore
+++ aboutmasterproject [2021/10/11 15:32] (current)
picard
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
-/**
-===== MSc thesis 2016-2017 Aug-Sept defences =====
-**Provisory planning**
+===== MSc and PhD thesis 2021-2022 proposals =====
+[[proj:2021|2021-2022 - Master and PhD Thesis Proposals]]
-**MSCI**
+===== MSc and PhD thesis 2020-2021 proposals =====
+[[proj:2020|2020-2021 - Master and PhD Thesis Proposals]]
-//Thursday 31 August:// **ENSIMAG H104**
-  * 11:00    Nikoukhah    Tina   (CONFIDENTIAL ; jury:  Emmanuel Maitre + tutor : Laurent Desbat)
-//Thursday 31 August:// **TIMC-IMAG F218 (visio-conf)**
+===== MSc and PhD thesis 2019-2020 proposals =====
-  * 16:30    Bahl    Gaétan         (jury: Laurent Desbat + Emmanuel Maitre)
+[[mpproposals2019|2019-2020 - Master and PhD Thesis Proposals]]
-//Friday 1rt September:// **ENSIMAG H102**
-  * 14:30    Bouhdid    Sabine    (jury:  Laurent Desbat + Luc Biard)
-  * 15:30    Seppecher    Coline    (jury:  Valérie Perrier(tutor) + Laurent Desbat)
-  * 16:30    Siala    Rafik    (jury:  Emmanuel Maitre(tutor)  + Laurent Desbat)
-----
-**Data Sciences and Stat** (Jury: Anatoli Iouditski + Jean-Baptiste Durand + Additional tutor if any)
-ENSIMAG H102
-  * 30/08/2017    09:30    Sarrazin    Gabriel (CONFIDENTIAL)
-  * 30/08/2017    10:30    Trimech    Abdellatif
-  * 30/08/2017    11:30    CHAIGNE    lucas
-  * 30/08/2017    14:00    PROS RIUS    Roger
-  * 30/08/2017    15:00    PUIG    Júlia (CONFIDENTIAL)
-  * 30/08/2017    16:00    RUBTSOVENKO    Sergey
-ENSIMAG H102
-  * 31/08/2017    09:00    Fischman    Adrien (CONFIDENTIAL) (Time slot uncertain)
-ENSIMAG D117
-  * 11/09/2017    10:00    Jaskolski Aliocha
-  * 11/09/2017    11:00    Lajous    Pierre (CONFIDENTIAL)
-  * 11/09/2017    12:00    ALLEMONIERE    Nicolas
-----
-Evaluation form (to be filled by your supervisor in the case he/she cannot attend the defence)
-{{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationform.docx |DOCX}}
-{{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationform.pdf |PDF}}
-*/
-===== MSc thesis 2018-2019 proposals =====
-[[mpproposals2018|2018-2019 - Master Thesis Proposals]]
 ===== Finding an internship, a job =====
@@ Line 88: / Line 57: @@
   * present an evaluation or validation of the solution or explain how the solution can be evaluated or validated.
-These results are reported in a Masters Research Project report (also called a Masters Thesis) and defended in an oral project defence. If successfully completed with a grade above 12, the Masters scientific research project demonstrates "Research Aptitude" and meets the formal requirements for admission to a Doctoral program.
+These results are reported in a Masters Research Project report (also called a Masters Thesis) and defended in an oral project defence. The Masters scientific research project demonstrates "Research Aptitude" and meets the formal requirements for admission to a Doctoral program.
-Note: In 2019, defences may either be in //French// or //English// - whichever is more comfortable. After 2019, defences will be in //English only// (slides and speech). Note however that we do not grade language, but the ability to clearly express and explain scientific ideas.
-** A few weeks before your defence you will be asked to send an email to msiam2@ensimag.fr containing **
-  * an A4 page illustrated summary according to the guiding file "M2MSIAMprojectA4.xxx"({{:m2templates:m2msiamprojecta4.doc|.doc}}, {{:m2templates:m2msiamprojecta4.odt|.odt}}, {{::m2templates:m2msiamprojecta4.pdf|.pdf}}). English is mandatory
-   * an one-slide-presentation according to the guiding file "M2MSIAMprojectOneSlide.xxx" ({{::m2templates:m2msiamprojectoneslide.ppt|.ppt}}, {{::m2templates:m2msiamprojectoneslide.odp|.odp}}, {{::m2projects:m2msiamprojectoneslide.pdf|.pdf}}). English is mandatory
@@ Line 102: / Line 68: @@
 The MSc thesis will be evaluated by:
   * Your advisor
-  * An external reviewer chosen by the heads of M2 MSIAM within a list proposed by the supervisor, containing three persons who do not belong to the same research team as the student.
+  * The defence committee (responsible of MSIAM, possibly your tutor and an external expert)
-  * The defence committee
 The details of the evaluation criteria are given in the document "{{ :m2projects:master_thesis_evaluation.pdf |MSc thesis evaluation procedure}}". We **strongly** recommend you to read this document.
+/*
+  * An external reviewer chosen by the heads of M2 MSIAM within a list proposed by the supervisor, containing three persons who do not belong to the same research team as the student.
+*/
+  * {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformsupervisor.pdf |Grid for supervisors (pdf)}} | {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformsupervisor.docx |Grid for supervisors (docx)}}
+ /* (to be filled by your supervisor and sent to msiam2@ensimag.fr at least a week before your defence)
+*/
-  * {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformsupervisor.pdf |Grid for supervisors (pdf)}} | {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformsupervisor.docx |Grid for supervisors (docx)}}  (to be filled by your supervisor and sent to msiam2@ensimag.fr at least a week before your defence)
-  * {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformreviewer.pdf |Grid for external reviewer (pdf)}} | {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformreviewer.docx | Grid for external reviewer (docx)}} (to be set to your reviewer or tutor with your report, at least 10 days before your defence)
   * {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformdefence.pdf |Grid for defence (pdf)}} | {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformdefence.docx | Grid for defence (docx)}} (for information)
+/*
+* {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformreviewer.pdf |Grid for external reviewer (pdf)}} | {{ :m2projects:msiam2internshipevaluationformreviewer.docx | Grid for external reviewer (docx)}} (to be set to your reviewer or tutor with your report, at least 10 days before your defence)
+*/
 Master Research Project report should be
   * well structured as a scientific report
   * expressed in a clear, understandable manner
-There is no minimal or maximal volume requirement, but 30 pages (plus eventual appendices) is a good average
+ is a minimal requirement, there is no maximal volume requirement, but 30 pages (plus eventual appendices) is a good average
 Oral presentation should
-  * be clear, well structured and respect the time limits (30-35 min)
+  * be clear, well structured
+/*
+and respect the time limits (30-35 min)
   * demonstrate an ability to respond to questions and defend the results of the project in a scientific discussion.
+  * */
+/*
 Please arrive 10 minutes before the time of defense, but do not enter the room before being invited to do so.\\
 Please bring two printed copies of the report at your defense. One of them will be given back to you at the end of defense.
+*/
 /*

aboutmasterproject.1563875244.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/07/23 11:47 by etore